Ok, it is trickier than I thought. On 2018/08/29 07:55:04, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > 2. As the error handling is a stack I think it is a valid use case for > another consumer of openssl to check for the > error later and not directly like e.g. with errno. >
but in this case, haven't we also broken these behaviors (i.e. leave error on stack for later processing) when we have added some more ERR_clear_error? CJ
