On 08/29/2018 10:49 AM, Christophe Jaillet wrote: > Ok, it is trickier than I thought. > > On 2018/08/29 07:55:04, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> 2. As the error handling is a stack I think it is a valid use case for >> another consumer of openssl to check for the >> error later and not directly like e.g. with errno. >> > > but in this case, haven't we also broken these behaviors (i.e. leave error on > stack for later processing) when we have added some more ERR_clear_error? Agreed, but obviously that wasn't noticed yet :-). Regards RĂ¼diger
- Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop after moving from ... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop after mov... Helmut K. C. Tessarek
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop after mov... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop after... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop after... Christophe Jaillet
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop a... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [Bug 62590] performance drop af... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance drop a... Christophe Jaillet
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 62590] performance dr... Ruediger Pluem