On 08/29/2018 10:49 AM, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
> Ok, it is trickier than I thought.
> 
> On 2018/08/29 07:55:04, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: 
>>
>> 2. As the error handling is a stack I think it is a valid use case for 
>> another consumer of openssl to check for the
>>    error later and not directly like e.g. with errno.
>>
> 
> but in this case, haven't we also broken these behaviors (i.e. leave error on 
> stack for later processing) when we have added some more ERR_clear_error?

Agreed, but obviously that wasn't noticed yet :-).

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to