> Am 03.09.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>: > > > > On 09/03/2018 01:32 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> >>> Am 03.09.2018 um 13:19 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>>> Dear SSL care takers and stake holders, > >> >>> IMO there is no problem with supporting it by default (not needing >>> explicit +TLSv1.3) in 2.4. Since "bleeding edge OpenSSL" is needed to >>> enable it at build time, this isn't going to break production users on >>> current systems. >> >> Interesting. If that is consensus, I'd revert my change from earlier today. > > +1 Done in r1839946. Cheers, Stefan
- TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Joe Orton
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Bernard Spil
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Ruediger Pluem
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Rainer Jung
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Jim Jagielski
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Dennis Clarke
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Dennis Clarke
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? William A Rowe Jr
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Stefan Eissing
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? William A Rowe Jr
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Bernard Spil
- Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x? Joe Orton