Hi, Steffen;

   Good catch. That particular change didn't have a CHANGES entry, so it
explains why it's missing. Luckily, there are no user-visible changes
(other than the error message being correct), so I think we're good to
move forward. Would love to see a test case added around this if you're
so inclined :-)


Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

On 9/21/2018 5:59 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Maybe I overlook it:
>
> I miss in the change log:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=1840546
>
> Looks it needs special windows test attention.
>
> Description:
>
> Merge r1801144, r1801148, r1801456 from trunk:
>
> mpm_winnt: Factor out a helper function to parse the type of an accept
> filter and use an appropriate enum for it.
>
> This makes the code in winnt_accept() a bit easier to follow.  As a minor
> side effect, it also fixes a small bug where the "unrecognized
> AcceptFilter
> '%s'" log entry would always contain "none" instead of the actually
> unrecognized kind of the accept filter.
>
> mpm_winnt: Fix typo in the logged message in winnt_get_connection().
>
> mpm_winnt: Following up on r1801144, use the new accept_filter_e enum
> values in a couple of missed places in winnt_accept().
>
> Submitted by: kotkov
> Reviewed by: jailletc36, jim (via inspection), wrowe
>
>
>
> On 18-09-18 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>>     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
>> candidate tarball as 2.4.35:
>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
>> sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
>> sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c
>> *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
>>
>

Reply via email to