No, I don't know and won't be able to check before tomorrow evening.
I would say that these tests were passing with 2.4.x when it was added (~3 weeks ago), so it could be a regression. But it needs to be checked to be sure about it. Nothing obvious in the recent commits look related to a change of behavior in this area. CJ > Message du 11/10/18 13:15 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > A : "firstname.lastname@example.org" > Copie à : > Objet : AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 > An: email@example.com > Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > Waouh! > > This would mean I've provided a new useful test! > (it has been added recently in r1841508) > > :) > > I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data when > running the test framework. > This helps to spot where new tests are needed. > > CJ > > > > Message du 11/10/18 10:08 > > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > > A : "firstname.lastname@example.org" > > Copie à : > > Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > > > Anyone else seeing > > > > t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) > > Failed tests: 8, 12 > > > > ? > > > > I don't see this with trunk on the same machine. Issue seems to be if input > > filtering is on on large POSTs. > > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Daniel Ruggeri > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 02:27 > > > An: email@example.com > > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > > > > > +1 from me (talking to myself). > > > > > > Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite > > > (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems only to apply w/ OpenSSL 1.1.1 and H2. > > > > > > system: > > > kernel: > > > name: Linux > > > release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 > > > version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13) > > > machine: x86_64 > > > > > > libraries: > > > openssl: "1.1.1" > > > openldap: "2.4.46" > > > apr: "1.6.5" > > > apr-util: "1.6.1" > > > iconv: "1.2.2" > > > brotli: "1.0.6" > > > nghttp2: "1.34.0" > > > zlib: "1.2.11" > > > pcre: "8.42" > > > libxml2: "2.9.8" > > > php: "5.6.38" > > > lua: "5.3.5" > > > curl: "7.61.1" > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Ruggeri > > > > > > On 10/10/2018 2:18 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > > > Hi, all; > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > > > > candidate tarball as 2.4.36: > > > > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > > > > > > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > > > > sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz > > > > sha256: > > > > ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288 > > > > *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz > > > > > > > >