FWIW, on macOS, both trunk and httpd-2.4 fail on this test: t/modules/buffer.t .................. 3/12 # Failed test 4 in t/modules/buffer.t at line 32 t/modules/buffer.t .................. 7/12 # Failed test 8 in t/modules/buffer.t at line 32 fail #2 t/modules/buffer.t .................. 11/12 # Failed test 12 in t/modules/buffer.t at line 32 fail #3 t/modules/buffer.t .................. Failed 3/12 subtests
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? > > Regards > > Rüdiger > > Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Waouh! > > > > This would mean I've provided a new useful test! > > (it has been added recently in r1841508) > > > > :) > > > > I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data when > running the test framework. > > This helps to spot where new tests are needed. > > > > CJ > > > > > > > > > Message du 11/10/18 10:08 > > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <[email protected]> > > A : "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Copie à : > > Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > > > Anyone else seeing > > > > t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) > > Failed tests: 8, 12 > > > > ? > > > > I don't see this with trunk on the same machine. Issue seems to be if input > > filtering is on on large POSTs. > > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]> > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 02:27 > > > An: [email protected] > > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > > > > > +1 from me (talking to myself). > > > > > > Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite > > > (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems only to apply w/ OpenSSL 1.1.1 and H2. > > > > > > system: > > > kernel: > > > name: Linux > > > release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 > > > version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13) > > > machine: x86_64 > > > > > > libraries: > > > openssl: "1.1.1" > > > openldap: "2.4.46" > > > apr: "1.6.5" > > > apr-util: "1.6.1" > > > iconv: "1.2.2" > > > brotli: "1.0.6" > > > nghttp2: "1.34.0" > > > zlib: "1.2.11" > > > pcre: "8.42" > > > libxml2: "2.9.8" > > > php: "5.6.38" > > > lua: "5.3.5" > > > curl: "7.61.1" > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Ruggeri > > > > > > On 10/10/2018 2:18 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > > > Hi, all; > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > > > > candidate tarball as 2.4.36: > > > > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > > > > > > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > > > > sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz > > > > sha256: > > > > ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288 > > > > *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz > > > > > > > >
