No it's not actually, nevermind.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:24 AM Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm, if r->pool gets destroyed by the first eor, the > eor_bucket_cleanup() for the copy should NULLify its b->data at the > same time, so it should be safe no? > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:22 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think your understanding is correct. > > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger > > > > > > C2 General > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Stefan Eissing <[email protected]> > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 11:02 > > > An: [email protected] > > > Betreff: eor bucket > > > > > > Could someone help me to check my understanding of the eor bucket > > > implementation? > > > > > > If an eor bucket is ever copied, there are 2 buckets with their b->data > > > pointing to the request_rec. Since this is local to the bucket, > > > destroying these 2 will call apr_pool_destroy() twice on the pool. > > > Correct? > > > > > > -Stefan
