On 10/5/19 8:30 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 5 Oct 2019, at 21:09, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase
in contributions and contributors...
Is this something the httpd project should consider? Especially w/ the
foundation officially supporting Github, it seems like time to have a
discussion about it, especially as we start thinking about the next 25 years of
this project :)
Cheers!
[apologies if this appears twice. Just sent with wrong from: address so I
expect
apache to bounce it. I'm still on limited 'net connectivity since my house
move -
ISP due on Oct 14th to install proper connection].
If it moves to github, how and at what level is history preserved? Github can do
alarming things with history even for a project that's always been there!
Don't we have an svn-git gateway? If that's not best-of-both-worlds, why not?
Call a vote such that we can all veto the idea. I could care less for a
git based repo within the Microsoft owned service. There is nothing
remotely wrong with subversion and "popular" is not a valid argument.
Madonna was popular also. So was Lawrence Welk.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional
