On 4/28/20 3:53 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:26 PM Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28 Apr 2020, at 12:49, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> That'd help being more reactive there, avoid having multiple places to
>>> follow, avoid tenchnical discussions taking place outside our mailing
>>> lists...
>>>
>>> Probably more a question for infra, but what does the team think?
>>
>> Please, no!
>>
>> We have commits arriving at cvs@httpd (dammit, how long ago was
>> it we moved from cvs to svn?), bugs, and some less-used lists.
>> If you like to see them all in one place, get your procmail (or whatever)
>> to sort it locally into the same folder!
>
> I think I did not explain myself well, I don't necessarily want github
> activity to arrive the dev@ mailing list, I want it to arrive
> _somewhere_ on one of our mailing lists. An existing one (dev@, bugs@
> ?) or a new [email protected] is fine by me.
>
> I just don't want to login to github to see what happens, though I can
> do that (or follow a link) once I'm aware of a PR or discussion
> happening there. My workflow being to read my emails and mailing lists
> I'm subscribed to..
>
>>
>> A mailbox full of messages "from" Gitbox and without meaningful
>> subject lines just provokes [select all] --> delete.
>
> I certainly agree with that, those not interested would not subscribe
> to [email protected] for instance.
+1 [email protected] (I declare the naming discussion for the list name
opened :-)).
This offers an easy opt-in for those who are interested in these updates.
Regards
Rüdiger
