Thanks! > Am 19.06.2020 um 14:02 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]>: > > > > On 6/18/20 9:58 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> >> Provided that my above understanding is correct I see no real benefit any >> longer in returning a 505 and I would >> revert r1878708 and all the follow ups (from r1878926 only the changes to >> modules/http2/h2_request.c and probably CHANGES as the >> remaining changes are no functional changes to my understanding). > > Done as r1878984 and r1878985 > > Regards > > RĂ¼diger >
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse_request_... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse_req... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_parse... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ap_p... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.0 in ... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Stefan Eissing
- Re: Reject HTTP protocols >= 2.... Yann Ylavic
