On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:44 PM jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 02/03/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that > >> can be used later by the balancer-manager handler to create the > >> corresponding workers and a customized load_balancer provider to replace > >> the ProxyPass logic? > > > > +1 > > > > That's something like this right? > > Yes ;-)
OK, but note that it also affects the proxy workers (not only balancers), such that it may define workers that weren't previously and thus enabling keepalive and things like this for them. So at backport time (if ever), this is possibly something to think about ;) Cheers; Yann.
