On 02/03/2021 16:07, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:44 PM jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote:

On 02/03/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote:

Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
can be used later by the balancer-manager handler to create the
corresponding workers and a customized load_balancer provider to replace
the ProxyPass logic?


That's something like this right?

Yes ;-)

OK, but note that it also affects the proxy workers (not only
balancers), such that it may define workers that weren't previously
and thus enabling keepalive and things like this for them.

Yes I already had to add a WorkerGrowth directive in my prototype to be able to create the workers via the logic of the balancer-handler.

So at backport time (if ever), this is possibly something to think about ;)

Yes I will try to minimize changes ;-)




Reply via email to