On 5/18/21 1:53 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> >> On 5/18/21 11:52 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: >>> On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >>>> Hi, all; >>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>>> >>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >>>> candidate tarball as 2.4.48: >>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>>> >>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>>> sha1: b581bcfdd939fe77c3821f7ad3863c7307374919 *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz >>>> sha256: 315c0bc50206b866fb17c2cdc28c1973765a8d59ca168b80286e8cb077d0510e >>>> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz >>>> sha512: >>>> 91980f757fc0dede8c6cbf54ed973f82a63098aa50d0fce15fe3537687b4ffbb48ed50cdb4ae14eb4a8703450f032daf73f4f3d5e2dd0f75721948e12a9c6dfb >>>> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz >>>> >>>> The SVN tag is '2.4.48' at r1889975. >>>> >>> -1 for me. >>> new mod_md doesn't build with LibreSSL because nor EVP_PKEY_X25519 nor >>> EVP_PKEY_X448 are defined. >>> I have asked LibreSSL guys if they will add EVP_PKEY_* constants to evp.h. >> >> Did 2.4.46 build with LibreSSL? > 2.4.46 and 2.4.47 builds.
> Looks like this is new in 2.4.48 but both LibreSSL users can work around > this or not build mod_md, it doesn't seem like a showstopper. > no real showstopper for me, please remove my "-1" vote. > Giovanni, if you care about keeping Libre support alive can you work out > how to get it building in Travis? It's daft if we are only hitting > these compat issues in post-roll testing. > I agree and I will take a look at it. > Regards, Joe >
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
