Le 18/05/2021 à 14:57, Giovanni Bechis a écrit :
On 5/18/21 1:53 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 5/18/21 11:52 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.48:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha1: b581bcfdd939fe77c3821f7ad3863c7307374919 *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz
sha256: 315c0bc50206b866fb17c2cdc28c1973765a8d59ca168b80286e8cb077d0510e
*httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz
sha512:
91980f757fc0dede8c6cbf54ed973f82a63098aa50d0fce15fe3537687b4ffbb48ed50cdb4ae14eb4a8703450f032daf73f4f3d5e2dd0f75721948e12a9c6dfb
*httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz
The SVN tag is '2.4.48' at r1889975.
-1 for me.
new mod_md doesn't build with LibreSSL because nor EVP_PKEY_X25519 nor
EVP_PKEY_X448 are defined.
I have asked LibreSSL guys if they will add EVP_PKEY_* constants to evp.h.
Hi Giovanni,
From my point of view, we do not *officially* support LibreSSL. The
mod_ssl doc is only about OpenSSL. I've found no reference to it, apart
from the many LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER in the code itself.
So, even if the LibreSSL built was completely broken, I wouldn't
consider it as a showstoper.
If we consider that Linking against LibreSSL is a must have, then, at
least we should update the doc.
Did 2.4.46 build with LibreSSL?
2.4.46 and 2.4.47 builds.
>> Looks like this is new in 2.4.48 but both LibreSSL users can work around
this or not build mod_md, it doesn't seem like a showstopper.
no real showstopper for me, please remove my "-1" vote.
Let us know if you want to change your vote to something else (see [1])
or if you just don't vote for this release.
Giovanni, if you care about keeping Libre support alive can you work out
how to get it building in Travis? It's daft if we are only hitting
these compat issues in post-roll testing.
I agree and I will take a look at it.
Just great :)
Thx.
And then, updating the doc would worth it ;-)
CJ
[1]:
https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions
