On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:29 PM Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > maybe completely off-topic, but we have the same kind of code in worker.c.
This may happen with mpm_worker too (with specific MPM tunings), but we have no report so far and mainly no active_daemons accounting there. This means more changes than in mpm_event, so I'd rather wait for someone being hit by this.. Maybe we could use total_non_dead and ap_daemons_limit instead of active_daemons and active_daemons_limit respectively, but mpm_event and mpm_worker don't really handle graceful restart in the same way anymore so this would need more analysis. Cheers; Yann.
