> > To sum up: > > +1 on the option to use Github PRs for backports. > -1 to mandating the use of Github PRs for backports. > For backports specifically: Is a middle ground to not have GH block merging based on CI checks? This way PRs could be required, so revieers (the same reviewers we have today in STATUS) can see test results.
Or is there something else objectionable about doing the work in a PR?
