On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:30 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > While looking at PR65769 I stumbled across the below in event.c (same in > worker.c) > > 3460 /* Don't perform idle maintenance when a child dies, > 3461 * only do it when there's a timeout. Remember only a > 3462 * finite number of children can die, and it's pretty > 3463 * pathological for a lot to die suddenly. > 3464 */ > 3465 continue; > > In case several processes or even all die by a segfault we would wait until > we have processed all that processes plus one second > until we start new processes. Shouldn't we perform an > perform_idle_server_maintenance in case the process died because of a fatal > signal?
+1
