Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine. Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend to count all positive votes as still applicable!
Otherwise, speak up! Kind Regards, Stefan > Am 07.06.2022 um 12:00 schrieb Stefan Eissing <ste...@eissing.org>: > > +1 from me on my macOS machine. > >> Am 07.06.2022 um 10:58 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>: >> >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build >>> candidates, right? >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: >>> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>> >>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>> sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb >>> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >>> sha512: >>> e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd >>> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >> >> +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 36, RHEL 8 & 9 (x86_64 only). >> >> One note: on F36 I had to manually add a route for the multicast range >> to get t/modules/heartbeat.t to pass, which I guess is a change in the >> default network configuration compared to earlier Fedora releases. >> >> Thanks for RMing! (x3) >> >> Regards, Joe >> >
