On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:17 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > Hello > > I am ready to commit MS-WDV support for mod_dav. There are many other > MS extensions, and I just wonder if we should prepare to configure MS > extensions one by one or as a whole > > I mean, what directive makes more sense in httpd.conf? > DAVMSext on (and if we add new MS extensions, this enables all of them) > DAVMSWDV on (and if we implement MS-FOO, we will add DAVMSFOO directive) > DAVMSext WDV (if we implemnt MS-FOO, it could become DAVMSext WDV FOO) > > We can also use the first cas, and turn it into the third case later, > with "on" being a shortcut for all implemented MS extensions.
I like the third case with an all/on option. If it will need to be per-directory, maybe an Options like syntax would make sense?
