On 2/10/23 3:53 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:17 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am ready to commit MS-WDV support for mod_dav. There are many other
>> MS extensions, and I just wonder if we should prepare to configure MS
>> extensions one by one or as a whole
>>
>> I mean, what directive makes more sense in httpd.conf?
>> DAVMSext on (and if we add new MS extensions, this enables all of them)
>> DAVMSWDV on (and if we implement MS-FOO, we will add DAVMSFOO directive)
>> DAVMSext WDV (if we implemnt MS-FOO, it could become DAVMSext WDV FOO)
>>
>> We can also use the first cas, and turn it into the third case later,
>> with "on" being a shortcut for all implemented MS extensions.
>
> I like the third case with an all/on option. If it will need to be
> per-directory, maybe an Options like syntax would make sense?
+1 to an Options like syntax. This would allow you to add a subset of
extensions in one go or all with the 'all' keyword plus you
could add / substract from parent list.
Regards
Rüdiger
