On 10/2/24 4:42 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024
> New Revision: 1921086
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921086&view=rev
> Log:
> pause on rewrite/proxy thing
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1921086&r1=1921085&r2=1921086&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024
> @@ -230,6 +218,19 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1920597 -c 1921076 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> +1: jorton,
>
> + *) mod_rewrite, mod_proxy: mod_proxy to cononicalize rewritten [P] URLs,
> + including "unix:" ones. PR 69235, PR 69260, PR 56264
> + Trunk version of patch:
> + https://svn.apache.org/r1838684
> + https://svn.apache.org/r1920570
> + https://svn.apache.org/r1920571
> + https://svn.apache.org/r1920572
> + Backport version for 2.4.x of patch:
> +
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/484.diff
> + Can be applied via apply_backport_pr.sh 484
> + +1: rpluem, ylavic
> + covener: what about remaining parts of
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 ? 69260 was marked dup
> of 69203.
I don't see where 69203 is marked as a duplicate as 69260. 69260 is a duplicate
of 69235.
Regards
Rüdiger
