On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 12:06 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/2/24 4:42 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: covener > > Date: Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024 > > New Revision: 1921086 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921086&view=rev > > Log: > > pause on rewrite/proxy thing > > > > Modified: > > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1921086&r1=1921085&r2=1921086&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024 > > > @@ -230,6 +218,19 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > > 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1920597 -c 1921076 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > > +1: jorton, > > > > + *) mod_rewrite, mod_proxy: mod_proxy to cononicalize rewritten [P] URLs, > > + including "unix:" ones. PR 69235, PR 69260, PR 56264 > > + Trunk version of patch: > > + https://svn.apache.org/r1838684 > > + https://svn.apache.org/r1920570 > > + https://svn.apache.org/r1920571 > > + https://svn.apache.org/r1920572 > > + Backport version for 2.4.x of patch: > > + > > https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/484.diff > > + Can be applied via apply_backport_pr.sh 484 > > + +1: rpluem, ylavic > > + covener: what about remaining parts of > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 ? 69260 was marked dup > > of 69203. > > I don't see where 69203 is marked as a duplicate as 69260. 69260 is a > duplicate of 69235.
My mistake, thanks! Will come back to it and update.
