Hi, Sorry for this second post. I open the bug https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69886 I really hope to have followed the right process.
Kind regards Le dim. 30 nov. 2025 à 11:23, Pierre Pilou <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > I’ve finished mod_random. I put the code in: > https://github.com/PilouGit/httpd/tree/mod_random > > I also gonna submit a patch to Bugzilla. > > The standalone module lives in: > https://github.com/PilouGit/mod_random > > I hope this could be useful. > > Regards, > > > Le mer. 5 nov. 2025 à 15:02, <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On 11/4/25 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 11/3/25 5:54 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:49 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 05:38:29PM +0100, Christian Folini via dev >> wrote: >> >>>> Before Pierre sets up to do a lot of work on this, could some of the >> >>>> greybards here weigh in on the chance that such an extension to >> >>>> mod_unique_id would actually have a chance of being accepted? >> >>> >> >>> Some beards are even white now! :-) >> >>> >> >>> Another way to ask: anyone dislikes the idea? >> >> >> >> I think it's reasonable as long as it's off by default (as it seems to >> >> be in the standalone module from the pseudo-doc). >> >> >> > >> > I would like to see a broader discussion first (in the sense of more >> people offering their opinion) >> > on the approach: >> > >> > Do we want to add this additional functionality as separate modules or >> do we want to integrate it into existing modules? >> > >> I think integrate features into existing modules would be preferable iff >> the changes are not huge, less code (to maintain), less bugs. >> Giovanni >> >
