Hi,
I full fill a bug for mod_random (
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69886).
Do I did in the right way ?
Kind regards
Pierre

Le dim. 30 nov. 2025 à 11:38, Pierre Pilou <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi,
> Sorry for this second post. I open the bug
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69886
> I really hope to have followed the right process.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Le dim. 30 nov. 2025 à 11:23, Pierre Pilou <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve finished mod_random. I put the code in:
>> https://github.com/PilouGit/httpd/tree/mod_random
>>
>> I also gonna submit a patch to Bugzilla.
>>
>> The standalone module lives in:
>> https://github.com/PilouGit/mod_random
>>
>> I hope this could be useful.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 5 nov. 2025 à 15:02, <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>>> On 11/4/25 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11/3/25 5:54 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:49 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 05:38:29PM +0100, Christian Folini via dev
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> Before Pierre sets up to do a lot of work on this, could some of the
>>> >>>> greybards here weigh in on the chance that such an extension to
>>> >>>> mod_unique_id would actually have a chance of being accepted?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Some beards are even white now! :-)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Another way to ask: anyone dislikes the idea?
>>> >>
>>> >> I think it's reasonable as long as it's off by default (as it seems to
>>> >> be in the standalone module from the pseudo-doc).
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I would like to see a broader discussion first (in the sense of more
>>> people offering their opinion)
>>> > on the approach:
>>> >
>>> > Do we want to add this additional functionality as separate modules or
>>> do we want to integrate it into existing modules?
>>> >
>>> I think integrate features into existing modules would be preferable iff
>>> the changes are not huge, less code (to maintain), less bugs.
>>>   Giovanni
>>>
>>

Reply via email to