On 2026/10/26 13:15:43 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 10/26/26 1:51 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 12:27:48PM +0100, Arturo Bernal wrote: > >> Hi Joe, > >> > >> Looks good to me overall. Just a few thoughts, unless I'm missing > >> something. > >> > >> For mod_lua, I don't think server/thread scopes are actually documented as > >> not thread-safe. My understanding is that the main concern is state > >> surviving across requests. I'd also be a bit cautious about excluding all > >> memory corruption involving persistent scopes. > > > > OK I removed that paragraph. > > Isn't the below the paragraph we are talking about? > > +The non-default long-lived `LuaScope server`, `thread` and `conn` ...
Yes, sorry, exactly that one, I failed to hit save before generating. Regards, Joe
