On 10/26/26 6:07 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On 2026/10/26 13:15:43 Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 10/26/26 1:51 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 12:27:48PM +0100, Arturo Bernal wrote:
>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me overall. Just a few thoughts, unless I'm missing
>>>> something.
>>>>
>>>> For mod_lua, I don't think server/thread scopes are actually documented as
>>>> not thread-safe. My understanding is that the main concern is state
>>>> surviving across requests. I'd also be a bit cautious about excluding all
>>>> memory corruption involving persistent scopes.
>>>
>>> OK I removed that paragraph.
>>
>> Isn't the below the paragraph we are talking about?
>>
>> +The non-default long-lived `LuaScope server`, `thread` and `conn`
> ...
>
> Yes, sorry, exactly that one, I failed to hit save before generating.
:-). Otherwise +1 to the changes.
Regards
Rüdiger
