great ! will definitely follow up...

Em qua., 10 de jun. de 2020 às 19:28, Bhavani Sudha <bhavanisud...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Ah okay. Thanks for letting us know. I created a Jira here to capture this
> thread - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1020. Feel free to add
> to the jira.
>
> Thanks,
> Sudha
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:03 AM Mario de Sá Vera <desav...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sure Sudha, I am afraid I am not allowed to become a Hudi contributor
> > unfortunately ... but restrict myself to be an enthusiastic as my current
> > employer applies some severe restrictions.
> >
> > I would be more than happy to contribute by specifying the requirements
> but
> > from a code developer perspective I will have to pass that for now...
> >
> > Em qua., 10 de jun. de 2020 às 18:40, Bhavani Sudha <
> > bhavanisud...@gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Definitely. I was trying to add you to the Hudi contributors so you can
> > > create a Jira . For that I need a jira id. If you have not already
> signed
> > > up, please sign up for Jira and let me know your jira id.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sudha
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:17 AM Mario de Sá Vera <desav...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sudha,
> > > >
> > > > Can you or Vinoth help me with this? How can we create a JIRA for
> that
> > ?
> > > >
> > > > I can collaborate bringing the description and definition of done.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Mario.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, 23:46 Bhavani Sudha, <bhavanisud...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Mario,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please share your jira id ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sudha
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:29 AM Mario de Sá Vera <
> desav...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hey Vinoth, I noticed you added this suggestion to the weekly log
> > ..
> > > > that
> > > > > > is great ! just let me know if I am able to create a JIRA , as I
> > > tried
> > > > to
> > > > > > go to HUDI project in Apache and did not find a way to do it. I
> can
> > > > bring
> > > > > > in a good description of the benefits etc...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks, Mario.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em seg., 8 de jun. de 2020 às 12:46, Vinoth Chandar <
> > > vin...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We can probably make a new JIRA. Not sure if there is an
> existing
> > > > JIRA
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > re-use.
> > > > > > > The Following modules are good to look at.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hudi-timeline-service
> > > > > > > packaging/hudi-timeline-server-bundle
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Vinoth
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:56 AM Mario de Sá Vera <
> > > desav...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry Vinoth for not being clear... If that is a work in
> > progress
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > have a jira I could follow up and contribute to ? If not ,
> what
> > > is
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > module name you suggest me looking at?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mario.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 02:12 Vinoth Chandar, <vin...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sorry did not understand the last part. :) are you
> suggesting
> > > we
> > > > > > > create a
> > > > > > > > > jira
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:08 AM Mario de Sá Vera <
> > > > > desav...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That sounds great ! Will check that and keep an eye on
> the
> > > long
> > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > server approach... once it gets a ticket I could watch
> for
> > > just
> > > > > let
> > > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > > please.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, 05:34 Vinoth Chandar, <
> > vin...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mario,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We actually started with the idea of making the
> timeline
> > > > > server,
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > long
> > > > > > > > > > > running service.  We have a module if you notice that
> > > builds
> > > > > our
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > bundle
> > > > > > > > > > > that you could deploy. May be you can play with it and
> > see
> > > if
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > sounds
> > > > > > > > > > > interesting to you. It will definitely have some rough
> > > edges
> > > > > > given
> > > > > > > > it’s
> > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > been widely used.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > Vinoth
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:33 AM Mario de Sá Vera <
> > > > > > > desav...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Vinoth, thanks for your comments on this. I spent
> > > > sometime
> > > > > > > > > thinking
> > > > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > another possibility which would be externalising the
> > Hudi
> > > > > > > timeline
> > > > > > > > > > > service
> > > > > > > > > > > > itself to an external server holding both operational
> > (ie
> > > > > Hudi)
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > business metadata.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > would you guys have any opinion on that ? would that
> be
> > > > easy
> > > > > > as I
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > seem to see a way yet , except reading about RocksDB
> > but
> > > > that
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > quite clear.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mario.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Em seg., 1 de jun. de 2020 às 16:01, Vinoth Chandar <
> > > > > > > > > > > > mail.vinoth.chan...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mario,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Hudi already
> > > allows
> > > > > > extra
> > > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be written atomically with each commit i.e write
> > > > operation.
> > > > > > In
> > > > > > > > > fact,
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is how we track checkpoints for our delta streamer
> > > tool..
> > > > > It
> > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > solve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the need for querying the data together with this
> > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > gives
> > > > > > > > > > > > > you ability to do some basic tagging.. if thats
> > useful
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>If we enable the timeline service metadata model
> to
> > > be
> > > > > > > extended
> > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > > > use the service instance itself to support
> > specialised
> > > > > > queries
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > involve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > business qualifiers in order to return a proper set
> > of
> > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > pointing
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the related commits
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good idea actually.. There is another
> > active
> > > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > > > thread
> > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > making the metadata queryable.. there is also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-309
> which
> > > we
> > > > > > paused
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > now..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But that's more in line with what you are thinking
> > IIUC
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vinoth
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:41 AM Mario de Sá Vera <
> > > > > > > > > desav...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Balaji,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > business metadata are all types of info related
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > where
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hudi solution is being used... from a COB (ie
> close
> > > of
> > > > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > date)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > related to that commit to any qualifier related
> to
> > > that
> > > > > > > commit
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > be useful to be associated with that commit id.
> If
> > we
> > > > > > enable
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > timeline
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > service metadata model to be extended we could
> use
> > > the
> > > > > > > service
> > > > > > > > > > > instance
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself to support specialised queries that
> involve
> > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > > qualifiers
> > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > order to return a proper set of metadata pointing
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > related
> > > > > > > > > > > > commits
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that answer a business query.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if we do not have that flexibility we might end
> up
> > > > > > creating a
> > > > > > > > > > > external
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > transaction log and then comes the hard task to
> > make
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > service
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > sync
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the timeline service.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > let me know if that makes sense to you,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Em seg., 1 de jun. de 2020 às 06:55, Balaji
> > > Varadarajan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <v.bal...@ymail.com.invalid> escreveu:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  Hi Mario,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Timeline Server was designed to serve hudi
> > metadata
> > > > for
> > > > > > > Hudi
> > > > > > > > > > > writers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > readers.  it may not be suitable to serve
> > arbitrary
> > > > > data.
> > > > > > > > But,
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interesting thought. Can you elaborate more on
> > what
> > > > > kind
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata are you looking. Is this something you
> > are
> > > > > > > planning
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > store
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit files ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Balaji.V
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >     On Sunday, May 31, 2020, 04:22:27 PM PDT,
> > Mario
> > > > de
> > > > > Sá
> > > > > > > > Vera
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > desav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  I see a need for extending the current
> timeline
> > > > server
> > > > > > > > schema
> > > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flexible model could be achieved in order to
> > > > > accommodate
> > > > > > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > let me know if that makes sense to anyone
> here...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to