Thanks Siva! I am not sure if thats a required aspect for the binding vote.
Its a minor aspect that does not interfere with testing/validation in
anyway. The actual release artifact needs to be rebuilt and repushed anyway
from a separate repo. Like I noted, I found the wiki instructions bit
ambiguous and I intend to make it clearer going forward so we can avoid
this in future.

I request everyone to consider this explanation, when casting your vote.

Thanks
Vinoth


On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:35 PM Sivabalan <n.siv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> - checksums and signatures [OK]
> - successfully built [OK]
> - ran quick start guide [OK]
> - Ran release validation guide [OK]
> - Ran test suite job w/ inserts, upserts, deletes and validation(spark sql
> and hive). Also same job w/ metadata enabled as well [OK]
>
> - Artifacts in staging repo : should be in separate repo where only rc2 is
> present. Right now, I see both rc1 and rc2 are present in the same repo.
>
> Will add my binding vote once artifacts are fixed.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:17 PM Udit Mehrotra <udi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > - Build successful
> > - Ran quickstart against S3
> > - Additional manual tests with MOR
> > - Additional manual testing with and without Metadata based listing
> enabled
> > - Release validation script successful
> >
> > Validating hudi-0.7.0-rc2 with release type "dev"
> > Checking Checksum of Source Release
> > -e Checksum Check of Source Release - [OK]
> >
> >   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time
> >  Current
> >                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left
> >  Speed
> > 100 34972  100 34972    0     0  70937      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
> > 70793
> > Checking Signature
> > -e Signature Check - [OK]
> >
> > Checking for binary files in source release
> > -e No Binary Files in Source Release? - [OK]
> >
> > Checking for DISCLAIMER
> > -e DISCLAIMER file exists ? [OK]
> >
> > Checking for LICENSE and NOTICE
> > -e License file exists ? [OK]
> > -e Notice file exists ? [OK]
> >
> > Performing custom Licensing Check
> > -e Licensing Check Passed [OK]
> >
> > Running RAT Check
> > -e RAT Check Passed [OK]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Udit
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:41 PM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> 0.7.0,
> > > as follows:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > >
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >
> > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> > be
> > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > > fingerprint 7F2A3BEB922181B06ACB1AA45F7D09E581D2BCB6 [3],
> > >
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >
> > > * source code tag "release-0.7.0-rc2" [5],
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Release Manager
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12348721
> > >
> > >
> > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hudi/hudi-0.7.0-rc2/
> > >
> > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hudi/KEYS
> > >
> > > [4]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1027/
> > >
> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/hudi/tree/release-0.7.0-rc2
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> -Sivabalan
>

Reply via email to