GitHub user chiruu12 added a comment to the discussion: [Discussion] The selection of Agentic/Taskflow frame
> [@Kryst4lDem0ni4s](https://github.com/Kryst4lDem0ni4s) i liked your idea of > caching and prometheus monitoring > > But using different frameworks for different tasks comes up with too many > dependency issues. Once i was working with crew ai, and > langchain-google-genai library, it took me two days to fix the dependency > conflicts by manually tring which version combination works. So it might give > hybrid features but its very inconvenient and could lead to Dependency hell. @Aryankb first of all good point and second this is one of the reasons why I suggested taking the features and writing our own as we can also try to work with the latest dependencies for our framework and it will be not lightweight anymore if will end up using so many frameworks (one of the points that sir made in the starting) Also not understand the code and just using them without getting to the bottom of it might cause problems which is bound to happen if we are going to use so many frameworks I would suggest using pyndatic (not the agentic framework) and a combination of agno and crewai in which we will be building our own agent (not exactly our own because we will be just modifying their code and using for our framework). It will ensure that we know what is happening and when and even if there is a component that is not fitting well, we will know why it is not fitting well, and we can make the required changes instead of being dependent on the framework we will be choosing. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/discussions/203#discussioncomment-12666609 ---- This is an automatically sent email for dev@hugegraph.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscr...@hugegraph.apache.org
