GitHub user chiruu12 added a comment to the discussion: [Discussion] The 
selection of Agentic/Taskflow frame

I believe for our use case we will have to train to model to also get us the 
text-to-cypher? As we wont know what kind of input the user is going to give us 
so for that we will have to fine tune a model for the same as the agent might 
need to write the cypher query on it's own?

> Hey [@imbajin](https://github.com/imbajin) I was working with agentic graph 
> RAG recently. The project aimed at Document QnA from a story book. It 
> required Agentic graph-RAG approach as in a story, different characters can 
> have different relationships with each other. Also different incidents are 
> linked to each other. So, here agentic graph-RAG worked well if someone asks 
> deep questions from story. So i made graph where centre node was book --> 
> first level nodes were chunks (each chapter of that book) --> second level 
> nodes were atomic_facts from that chunk--> final level nodes were characters. 
> Same characters from different atomic_facts were connected (so as to know 
> that character was present in which parts of the story). Also different 
> characters were connected to each other having some relationships.
> 
> So for finding the answer of user's question, I used LANGGRAPH. It was really 
> lightweight , Fast and simple to implement it.
> 
> There were agents -
> 
> * character finder (to find all characters, user's question contains)
> * atomic fact finder ( worked at finding the relevant atomic facts for each 
> character, according to user query. Using similarity search)
> * information validator  (checked if information is enough)
> * atomic fact extractor (if information is not enough, then extract the 
> nearby atomic fact, or nearby events in that story)
> * final composer (compose final answer using extracted information and user 
> query.
> 
> It was a fixed agentic system, worked at graphs of one kind only
> 
> I have a question, regarding what is the requirement ? Do we need to create a 
> Interface, where user can create his own agentic system for his Graph , just 
> using drag-drop or prompts (without code) If yes, then using LANGGRAPH or 
> completely doing it manually would be the best approach, because there will 
> be transparency , and user would know what is happening. Using CrewAI would 
> not be a good idea , as there we don't know what is happening under the hood.
> 
> Here is the project :- https://github.com/Aryankb/DOC_QNA



GitHub link: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/discussions/203#discussioncomment-12666595

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@hugegraph.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscr...@hugegraph.apache.org

Reply via email to