I'm currently faxing the CLA to Apache... Their fax machine is pretty busy right now. Will try writing some cases for the logging proxies next week.
I guess that for bug fixes (diff files) to existing iBatis files the "ASF Granted" while attaching the file in JIRA is enough, or not? There are not that many ways to fix most bugs in existing functionality. What's actually the right way of getting fixes in SVN... something as: 1) I find a JIRA issue I like to solve (an unassigned one) 2) I simulate the problem, prepare a fix, test the fix 3) Attach the diff file to the issue in JIRA 4) The original reporter verifies fix 5) One or the other committer verifies it himself when he gets to having a look at the issue in JIRA and if ok commits it. Or am I missing something? Regards, Sven >----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >Van: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Verzonden: donderdag, juni 23, 2005 06:45 AM >Aan: [email protected] >Onderwerp: Re: testcase for logging switched on and off > >You'd probably be better off just writing better unit tests (or any) for the >connection log proxy stuff. > >Thanks for the contribution by the way. If you want to make it part of the >official release, we'll need you to submit a CLA with Apache. > >Cheers, >Clinton > >On 6/22/05, Sven Boden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Is there a preferred way of making testcases for iBatis for things >> that go wrong between using iBatis with and without logging. Or is the >> procedure to just run iBatis unit testcases with and without logging? >> >> I'm giving it a try to make a unit test case for jira IBATIS-152/149. >> >> Regards, >> Sven Boden >> >> >
