+1
Thanks, Larry
I prefer to have a Windows OS, as the main usage of iBATAIS.NET is targeted Windows and Sql Server.
We could then pass the tests with MSDE ( a light and free Sql Server instance).
On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, i just bopped into the irc channel, and there are no boxen to
actually *do* the builds on (unless we are using gump), only to hold
the results.
I have 6-8 boxes in my basement..I think one has a linux on it that i
can use to set up some stuff to get it going. So, do you think
ibatis.net will build on linux with mono and nant? If not i suppose I
can setup a winwoes box for you... ;-)
Larry
On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's plenty of hardware for things like this. It's just a matter of
> spending some quality time with infrastructure, preferably by IRC [and
> I think everyone knows how much I adore IRC :)].
>
> * http://apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html
>
> Several projects have their own zone on helios now:
>
> * http://apache.org/dev/machines.html
>
> -T.
>
> On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That sounds reasonable to me. I would be more than willing to set up a
> > box to do the builds here if there is not one at apache to use.
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is one already?
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All ASF projects are expected to provide automatic nightly builds. We
> > > just haven't gotten to around to that yet. The nightly builds live for
> > > seven days each, and then get recycled, so as to not eat up too much
> > > disk space.
> > >
> > > Any non-automatic release is generally tagged with a sequential
> > > version number. After someone rolls it, we vote on it's quality:
> > > Alpha, Beta, General Release. A release can start out as Alpha and
> > > work its way up to General Release as more people try it. A release
> > > can also be downgraded if a problem is found later.
> > >
> > > Of course, since the Subversion revision numbers are essentially tags,
> > > we could also snag any given nightly build (once we have them) and
> > > designate it "version #.#.#", making a note in our status file that
> > > version #.#.# corresponds to SVN revision ####.
> > >
> > > Later, if we ever need to branch, we can branch on a revision number
> > > as easily as a tag.
> > >
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > > On 7/5/05, Sven Boden < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not specific to the problem below. But what about providing iBATIS
> > > > development releases, e.g. after every big round of SVN changes. Most
> > > > other projects seem to do it.
> > > >
> > > > A few advantages I see:
> > > > - It's easier to tell people: "test with the development jar files"
> > > > than "extract the sources from SVN, compile and test"
> > > > - Better quality of releases as more people would already test/use the
> > > > development releases.
> > > > - Less "pressure" to release new versions.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Sven Boden
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:29:03 -0600, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >As soon as brandon gives the go-ahead on IBATIS-148, then we'll be good to
> > > > >go!
> > > > >
> > > > >Cheers,
> > > > >clinton
> > > > >
> > > > >On 7/5/05, Guido García Bernardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am facing with this bug:
> > > > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-152 , solved in 2.1.5
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is there any release plan for 2.1.5 so that I can decide whether or not
> > > > >> I'll need to use 2.0.9b or compile the source?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Guido García Bernardo - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> Tfn. +34 983 54 89 08
> > > > >> ITDEUSTO - Valladolid
>
