Stupid gmail - this was supposed to go to the list... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jul 7, 2005 6:33 AM Subject: Re: ibatis 2.1.5 release plan To: Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mark this day, you may never hear me say this again: Yes, Windows is probably the best choice for this task. It will take a bit longer for me to get a windows box set up and ready to go. Will XP be OK? Can one of you ibatis.net guys take a look at the build for it? There are several paths coded into it that could be made into variables to simplify the build. Larry On 7/6/05, Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > Thanks, Larry > > I prefer to have a Windows OS, as the main usage of iBATAIS.NET is targeted > Windows and Sql Server. > We could then pass the tests with MSDE ( a light and free Sql Server > instance). > > > On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, i just bopped into the irc channel, and there are no boxen to > > actually *do* the builds on (unless we are using gump), only to hold > > the results. > > > > I have 6-8 boxes in my basement..I think one has a linux on it that i > > can use to set up some stuff to get it going. So, do you think > > ibatis.net will build on linux with mono and nant? If not i suppose I > > can setup a winwoes box for you... ;-) > > > > Larry > > > > On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's plenty of hardware for things like this. It's just a matter of > > > spending some quality time with infrastructure, preferably by IRC [and > > > I think everyone knows how much I adore IRC :)]. > > > > > > * http://apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html > > > > > > Several projects have their own zone on helios now: > > > > > > * http://apache.org/dev/machines.html > > > > > > -T. > > > > > > On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. I would be more than willing to set up a > > > > box to do the builds here if there is not one at apache to use. > > > > > > > > Does anyone know if there is one already? > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > All ASF projects are expected to provide automatic nightly builds. > We > > > > > just haven't gotten to around to that yet. The nightly builds live > for > > > > > seven days each, and then get recycled, so as to not eat up too much > > > > > disk space. > > > > > > > > > > Any non-automatic release is generally tagged with a sequential > > > > > version number. After someone rolls it, we vote on it's quality: > > > > > Alpha, Beta, General Release. A release can start out as Alpha and > > > > > work its way up to General Release as more people try it. A release > > > > > can also be downgraded if a problem is found later. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, since the Subversion revision numbers are essentially > tags, > > > > > we could also snag any given nightly build (once we have them) and > > > > > designate it "version #.#.#", making a note in our status file that > > > > > version #.#.# corresponds to SVN revision ####. > > > > > > > > > > Later, if we ever need to branch, we can branch on a revision number > > > > > as easily as a tag. > > > > > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > > > > > On 7/5/05, Sven Boden < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Not specific to the problem below. But what about providing iBATIS > > > > > > development releases, e.g. after every big round of SVN changes. > Most > > > > > > other projects seem to do it. > > > > > > > > > > > > A few advantages I see: > > > > > > - It's easier to tell people: "test with the development jar > files" > > > > > > than "extract the sources from SVN, compile and test" > > > > > > - Better quality of releases as more people would already test/use > the > > > > > > development releases. > > > > > > - Less "pressure" to release new versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sven Boden > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:29:03 -0600, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >As soon as brandon gives the go-ahead on IBATIS-148, then we'll > be good to > > > > > > >go! > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > > >clinton > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On 7/5/05, Guido García Bernardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I am facing with this bug: > > > > > > >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-152 , solved in > 2.1.5 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Is there any release plan for 2.1.5 so that I can decide > whether or not > > > > > > >> I'll need to use 2.0.9b or compile the source? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thank you very much. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> Guido García Bernardo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >> Tfn. +34 983 54 89 08 > > > > > > >> ITDEUSTO - Valladolid > > > > > > >
