Just curious. Are we still honoring access privileges on fields or are we doing an end around on them and setting regardless? I'm hoping we still honor public, package, protected, private. Otherwise that can get unpredictable.
Brandon On 2/10/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Very well. In fact, the fallback to fields may turn out to be advantageous. Let's see how it goes, as you said, and listen to the feedback. Thanks Clinton! Clinton Begin wrote: > I think we need a stronger argument for a switch than "I might shoot > myself in the foot". :-) > > It's pretty simple to force methods to be called (write them) and to > avoid fields from being loaded in odd cases (don't include them in the > select clause). > > Let's give it some time the way it is, and if many people start > finding unexpected results due to field mappings, then let's add a > switch at that time. > > Cheers, > Clinton
