+1 definitely - no more question marks. Jeff Butler
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > One thing I forgot to mention... > > With iB3 I don't think we should support question mark parameters at all > anymore. So even if you specify the <param> elements, they're no longer > ordinal. They are looked up from the #param placeholders in the statement. > That way SQL is more readable, and even the <param> elements need not be > repeated if used. > > Clinton > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > 3. <param element> : The thought here is to allow for specifying the >> > options (e.g. javaType="") outside of the SQL statement and to avoid >> > duplication if the same property is used more than once. But maybe it's >> too >> > much for such a rare case? But still, some people may prefer to keep >> the >> > param details out of the SQL itself. Hmmm... anyone else have an >> opinion >> > here? I'd love to only use inline params myself. But it's almost too >> easy >> > to agree in this case. :-) >> >> I like the *option* for param elements because it can help keep the sql >> cleaner. >> >> One of the biggest advantages of ibatis is that you can easily take >> the sql and just run it. IMO, adding a ton of inline parameter mapping >> info can make that harder. >> >> Larry >> > >
