+1 (non-binding)

I reran the TPC-DS benchmark with RC2, with the same setup as with RC1, and
there were no warnings about decimal pushdown, so that appears resolved.
The results were also a bit better at 4915 sec.

-Bryan

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:37 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated signature, checksum, local build + tests.
>
> - Anton
>
> On 2023/09/30 04:58:15 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > As for RC1, I checked:
> > - signature and hash are OK
> > - ASF headers are there
> > - source distribution doesn't contain binary
> > - build is OK
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:25 AM Anton Okolnychyi
> > <aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> Iceberg 1.4.0 release.
> > >
> > > The commit ID is 10367c380098c2e06a49521a33681ac7f6c64b2c
> > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc2
> > > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc2
> > > *
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/10367c380098c2e06a49521a33681ac7f6c64b2c
> > >
> > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc2
> > >
> > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
> > >
> > > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository
> URL is:
> > > *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1146/
> > >
> > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > >
> > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded)
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.4.0
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >
> > > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
> encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3
> binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
> > >
> > > - Anton
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to