+1 for this proposal. On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 3:40 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the proposal. > > - Ajantha > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:29 AM Benny Chow <btc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for separate view and table objects. Walaa's Spark >> implementation demonstrates how little change it takes on the Iceberg APIs >> to start sharing MVs between engines. >> >> Thanks >> Benny >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:52 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa < >> wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized >>> views in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg >>> view and an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object >>> retains relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design, >>> which we can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2]. >>> >>> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in >>> various forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. >>> >>> Please respond with your recommendation: >>> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model. >>> 0 if you are neutral. >>> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Walaa. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043 >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830 >>> [3] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY >>> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420 >>> [5] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF >>> [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh >>> [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y >>> >>
