+1 to separate, it makes sense to me. Regards JB
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa <wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized views > in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg view and > an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object retains > relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design, which we > can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2]. > > This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in various > forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. > > Please respond with your recommendation: > +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model. > 0 if you are neutral. > -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model. > > Thanks, > Walaa. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043 > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830 > [3] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY > [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420 > [5] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF > [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh > [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y
