A reminder. GitHub Discussion has been enabled on iceberg-rust and there
are already interesting ideas open for discussion
<https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/discussions/categories/ideas>.
Please weigh in.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 9:39 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi:
>
>
>> But one minor concern, since this has to be enabled at the repo level(go,
>> rust, core), wondering if this can lead to limited participation as against
>> when discussed in a mailing list.
>
>
> This is a good point, but as we discussed, github discussions are usually
> used for user related questions about some subproject. We can always
> redirect questions about the whole project/spec to the mail list, the
> iceberg repo or slack to have more engagement.
>
>
> It seems that there is no strong objection about it, and our consensus is
> to enable it on iceberg-rust first.
>
> Thanks to everyone in joining the discussion, I'll create an infra ticket
> to enable it on iceberg-rust.
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for enabling it on iceberg-rust first. IMO, this can benefit many
>> code-related discussions. GitHub provides a convenient way for users to
>> point out specific parts of the source code by pasting the permalink, which
>> GitHub automatically renders.
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing how this progresses in iceberg-rust.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Honah
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:31 AM karuppayya <karuppayya1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to having things on Github.
>>> But one minor concern, since this has to be enabled at the repo
>>> level(go, rust, core), wondering if this can lead to limited participation
>>> as against when discussed in a mailing list.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Karuppayya
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to