dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Jones, Danny
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Renjie Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Reduce CI runner time by running JDK 21 only on main/nightly Kevin Liu
• [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Szehon Ho
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec huaxin gao
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Steve
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Tanmay Rauth
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] Clarify day partition transform result type as date in the spec Andrei Tserakhau via dev
• [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 zhuo wang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Raúl Cumplido
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Manu Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Tanmay Rauth
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Guotao Yu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Renjie Liu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC3 Gang Wu
• Upgrading arrow-java from 15.0.2 to 19.0.0 Robert Kruszewski
• Iceberg Terraform Provider Update Alex Stephen via dev
• Request for review on pull request #15639 Aryash Gupta
  • Re: Request for review on pull request #15639 Daniel Weeks
  • Re: Request for review on pull request #15639 Russell Spitzer
• RE: Re: Proposal: Parquet footer size in Iceberg metadata Varun Lakhyani
  • RE: Proposal: Parquet footer size in Iceberg metadata Varun Lakhyani
  • RE: Proposal: Parquet footer size in Iceberg metadata Varun Lakhyani
• [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Manu Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC2 Junwang Zhao
• [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Zehua Zou
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 shuxu li
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Guotao Yu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 赵烜
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Manu Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC1 Junwang Zhao
• [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Jones, Danny
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Combine 3 GET calls for parquet reads - Root Manifest, Datafiles and compaction of small files Steve Loughran
• [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU Agenda and Registration is Live! Danica Fine
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU Agenda and Registration is Live! Raúl Cumplido
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU Agenda and Registration is Live! Danica Fine
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU Agenda and Registration is Live! Sung Yun
• [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Steven Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Aihua Xu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? huaxin gao
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Steve
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Prashant Singh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Tanmay Rauth
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Manu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Matt Butrovich
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] 1.11.1 / 1.10.3 patch releases? Kevin Liu
• [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Guotao Yu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Steven Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 zhuo wang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Zehua Zou
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Manu Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Junwang Zhao
  • Re: [VOTE][C++] Release Apache Iceberg C++ 0.3.0 RC0 Renjie Liu
• [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.12.0 release Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.12.0 release Steven Wu
• [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Christian Thiel
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Prashant Singh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Write-path gap for field-id-bound policy during schema evolution Sung Yun
• [DISCUSS] Variant Shredding Policy Across Iceberg Implementations Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Shredding Policy Across Iceberg Implementations kurtiscwright
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Shredding Policy Across Iceberg Implementations Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Shredding Policy Across Iceberg Implementations Neelesh Salian
• [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Péter Váry
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Anoop Johnson
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Szehon Ho
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Steve
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Prashant Singh
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git huaxin gao
  • Re: [VOTE] Add draft bitmap spec to git Ryan Blue
• [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Kevin Liu
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Danica Fine
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Sung Yun
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Danica Fine
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Zhenni Wu
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Steven Wu
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Kurtis Wright
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Matt Topol
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Bill Zhang
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Viktor Kessler via dev
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Danica Fine
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [Discuss] Iceberg Summit 2027 Anatolii Popov via dev
• [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Xiening Dai
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Maninder Parmar
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Xiening Dai
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Xiening Dai
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Xiening Dai
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [Discuss] Global Snapshot Consistency for Iceberg Tables Xiening Dai
• [Discuss] Efficient CDC Upserts Ankit Kumar
  • Re: [Discuss] Efficient CDC Upserts Péter Váry
• [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. kurtiscwright
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Szehon Ho
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Szehon Ho
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Szehon Ho
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Cheng Pan
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Szehon Ho
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Cheng Pan
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [Discuss] Spark versioning strategy with accelerated Spark releases. Anton Okolnychyi
• Relative paths and location resolution samuel pacheco cantu via dev
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution Daniel Weeks
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution Steven Wu
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution samuel pacheco cantu via dev
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution Yufei Gu
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution samuel pacheco cantu via dev
  • Re: Relative paths and location resolution samuel pacheco cantu via dev
• [DISCUSS] Avro encoding for non-zone timestamp types (PR #16577, issue #12751) Shekhar Rajak
• Tracking issue - iceberg-rust v0.10.0 Jones, Danny
• [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Jordan Epstein
  • Re: [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Shawn Chang
  • Re: [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Jared Yu
  • Re: [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Gang Wu
  • Re: [Discuss] Reviewer Bandwidth In Iceberg-Rust Renjie Liu
• [DISCUSS] Reviving the catalog cache policy proposal (#14417 / #14440) Noritaka Sekiyama via dev
• Dedicated sync for Iceberg constraint support huaxin gao

• Earlier messages
• Later messages