+1

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:11 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey Manu,
>
> That's an excellent question. I took the following rationale:
>
>    - For the code, the iceberg-core module, a minor release deprecation
>    cycle is required
>    <https://iceberg.apache.org/contribute/#semantic-versioning>.
>    - For the spec, I noticed that the deprecation of the
>    
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>    getToken
>    
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>    endpoint
>    
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>  was
>    set for removal in 2.0, so that's what I took for the last-column-id PR
>    as well.
>
> To conclude: both spec and code will be deprecated in the following minor
> release (1.8.x), the removal from the code is staged for the next minor
> (1.9.x) or major release (2.x.x), and the removal from the spec is planned
> for (2.x.x). Hope this clarifies.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko Driesprong
>
> Op di 19 nov 2024 om 10:45 schreef Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks Fokko.
>>
>> To be clear, are you proposing to deprecate last-column-id in 1.8.0 and
>> remove in 1.9.0+?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:18 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Based on the positive feedback on the [DISCUSS] thread
>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/jz5s7pm2bhbm87ft495d6yrsh3bqvtb9> and
>>> the pull-request on GitHub
>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11514/>, I would like to raise
>>> a vote to deprecate and remove the last-column-id field from the spec.
>>> Since this is a spec change, please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>> [ ] 0
>>> [ ] -1, do not make these changes because...
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>

Reply via email to