Hey everyone, Thanks everyone for being on top of 0.9.0. I've done some testing and found a few more small improvements <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22PyIceberg+0.9.0%22> that would be great to get into 0.9.0.
Kind regards, Fokko Op do 20 feb 2025 om 11:52 schreef Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>: > Thanks Kevin for raising this! > > - For the first issue, I think we should remove the deprecation > message and throw an error when the table reference is used. > - I don't think we should throw, I've left a comment on the PR > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1689/>. > - For the second > - We should clean this one up, I took the liberty of creating a PR > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1691>. > - For deprecating botocore > - I'm leaning towards undoing this deprecation since there is no > good alternative without going into complex configuration > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1299>. I also > created a PR for that > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1692>. > > Thanks everyone, and LMKWYT! > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > > > Op wo 19 feb 2025 om 23:29 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: > >> Hey folks, >> >> While working on the 0.9.0 release candidate, we went through the process >> of finding deprecation which should be removed in the upcoming release >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/main/mkdocs/docs/how-to-release.md#preparing-for-a-release> >> . >> >> For the 0.9.0 release, there are 3 deprecations marked for removal. >> * Table name reference in scan expression >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/efc8b5ac0f16717f776e034ecf9a9e9bdabd8424/pyiceberg/expressions/parser.py#L95> >> >> * REST catalog client AUTH_URL >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/efc8b5ac0f16717f776e034ecf9a9e9bdabd8424/pyiceberg/catalog/rest.py#L324> >> >> * Deprecate botocore session >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/efc8b5ac0f16717f776e034ecf9a9e9bdabd8424/pyiceberg/catalog/__init__.py#L790> >> >> >> For the first issue, I think we should remove the deprecation message and >> throw an error when the table reference is used. >> For the second and third issue, I think we should push back the removal >> to the next release since we don't have a good solution yet. >> >> Would love to hear what others think about this approach. Please let us >> know if there are any concerns. >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 7:11 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Kevin, >>> >>> Thanks for raising this. That sounds like a great idea to me, and thanks >>> Drew for being the release manager for 0.9.0. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op ma 17 feb 2025 om 23:41 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >>> >>>> Thanks for volunteering! I'm happy to assist in any way I can. Let's >>>> coordinate on Slack :) >>>> >>>> Quick follow up on the commit hash pinned above, it's meant as a >>>> reference point and not the absolute cutoff. In fact, we merged a few PRs >>>> today that will be included in 0.9.0. Please chime in here if there are >>>> other PRs that you think should be part of this upcoming release. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:35 AM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Kevin, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for kicking this off. It’s exciting to see how much PyIceberg >>>>> has been evolving! I’d be happy to take on the Release Manager role for >>>>> this release! I think it would be a good opportunity to try out the new >>>>> release process documentation. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Drew >>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 8:55 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been a while since we released a new version of PyIceberg! The >>>>>> last minor release (0.8.0) was on November 18, and the most recent patch >>>>>> release (0.8.1) was on December 6. Time flies! There have been >200 >>>>>> commits since 0.8.0 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/compare/pyiceberg-0.8.0...main> >>>>>> and >>>>>> A LOT of great features contributed by the community >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose we cut a new release for version 0.9.0 based on the current >>>>>> HEAD of the main branch, commit 300b840 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/commit/300b8405a0fe7d0111321e5644d704026af9266b> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm happy to serve as the Release Manager again. But since I recently >>>>>> rewrote the " >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/main/mkdocs/docs/how-to-release.md>How >>>>>> to Release" documentation >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/main/mkdocs/docs/how-to-release.md>, >>>>>> it would be great if someone else could follow the updated instructions >>>>>> to >>>>>> ensure they are clear. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've started a thread on Slack >>>>>> <https://apache-iceberg.slack.com/archives/C029EE6HQ5D/p1738367232843719> >>>>>> to >>>>>> gather feedback from the community. Please feel free to join the >>>>>> discussion >>>>>> there or share your thoughts in this thread about the upcoming release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Kevin Liu >>>>>> >>>>>>
