+1 (non-binding)
> On May 6, 2025, at 2:53 PM, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks to Jia and Szehon for the quick turn-around getting this done!
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org
> <mailto:ji...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks for putting this together!
>>
>> Jia Yu
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:szehon.apa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> As discussed briefly in
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ncj0xjh2ct5xvovn4tzc45lkm1wbmorq, there is
>>> a minor clarification for geo type bounds that we want to get in for
>>> finalizing V3 spec. We want to clarify the behavior of null/NaN coordinate
>>> values in geo objects. There can be many coordinate values in a geo
>>> object, only the null/NaN ones are skipped, the rest are not skipped.
>>>
>>> I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to V3 spec. The PR is:
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12956.
>>>
>>> This is going on in parallel with a parquet-format pr:
>>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/494
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Szehon
