The vote passes with 7 binding +1's and 4 non-binding +1's. Thanks everyone for voting! Szehon
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:26 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 10:41 AM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 9:29 AM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 8:37 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:24 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (bind) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:32 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 4:14 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The clarification is simple and clear from the writer's perspective. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CMIW, the implication is that reader should drop bbox with any NaN >>>>>>> value regardless of the coordinate axis (in case of a writer bug). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 6:21 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng >>>>>>> <hua...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On May 6, 2025, at 2:53 PM, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks to Jia and Szehon for the quick turn-around getting this >>>>>>>> done! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for putting this together! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jia Yu >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As discussed briefly in >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ncj0xjh2ct5xvovn4tzc45lkm1wbmorq, >>>>>>>>>> there is a minor clarification for geo type bounds that we want to >>>>>>>>>> get in >>>>>>>>>> for finalizing V3 spec. We want to clarify the behavior of null/NaN >>>>>>>>>> coordinate values in geo objects. There can be many coordinate >>>>>>>>>> values in a >>>>>>>>>> geo object, only the null/NaN ones are skipped, the rest are not >>>>>>>>>> skipped. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to V3 spec. >>>>>>>>>> The PR is: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12956. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is going on in parallel with a parquet-format pr: >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/494 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Szehon >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
