Great idea Denny! Personally, I'd like to see a unified effort on the rust implementation for iceberg.
I'll reach out to the author on Slack. Can you include you in the conversation? Happy to include anyone else interested too. I'll update this thread again once we get some updates. Best, Kevin Liu On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 3:07 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > Prior to PMC private mailing / ASF trademark, perhaps we can start a > conversation with the iceberg-rust > <https://github.com/JanKaul/iceberg-rust> crate folks? > > It looks like the project is active and perhaps we can discuss with them > the goals to figure out the best way to leverage each others' work while > also ensuring folks know the difference between projects (which may require > renaming). I've had this happen to a number of other Rust and Python-based > projects due to the excitement and faster code development cycles. > > WDYT? > Denny > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 3:00 PM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I was working on the iceberg-rust 0.5.1 release and noticed a few crates >> on crates.io that seem to be unofficial implementations or releases of >> iceberg-rust. >> >> For example, the official Apache iceberg-rust repo is published under the >> ` <https://crates.io/crates/iceberg>iceberg` >> <https://crates.io/crates/iceberg> crate. But there’s also a crate >> called ` <https://crates.io/crates/iceberg-rust>iceberg-rust` >> <https://crates.io/crates/iceberg-rust> that points to a different repo >> outside the Apache org. >> There are a few other crates following a similar pattern. >> >> I want to start this thread to raise awareness of the issue and figure >> out the appropriate path for trademark usage. Let me know if I should >> forward this to the PMC private mailing list and/or the apache trademark >> email. >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >
