+1 On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:23 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:50 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:33 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:35 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to mark 503 as non-retryable >>>>>> error code for the Update Table. As it can lead to table corruption >>>>>> otherwise. The proposed language in the spec pr also gives rooms for >>>>>> servers who still want to use 503 for retries. >>>>>> >>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>> >>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13619/files >>>>>> Discuss Thread: >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg8m058z1jy9dss7jotx6g8h9ko1fxho >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Prashant >>>>>> >>>>>
