+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:23 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:50 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:33 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:35 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to mark 503 as non-retryable >>>>>>> error code for the Update Table. As it can lead to table corruption >>>>>>> otherwise. The proposed language in the spec pr also gives rooms for >>>>>>> servers who still want to use 503 for retries. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13619/files >>>>>>> Discuss Thread: >>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg8m058z1jy9dss7jotx6g8h9ko1fxho >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>> >>>>>>
