+1 (non-binding)

Ran verify_rc.sh  in macOS arm64 (Homebrew clang version 18.1.8).

> 2025年9月10日 19:10,David Li <lidav...@apache.org> 写道:
> 
> +1 (non-binding) 
> 
> Tested Ubuntu 25.04/AMD64 (gcc 14.2.0)
> 
> Maybe verify_rc.sh should use --compile-no-warning-as-error with CMake? The 
> build is full of warnings by default and the CMakeLists.txt unconditionally 
> enables -Werror
> 
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025, at 19:08, Gang Wu wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC4) of Apache 
>> Iceberg
>> C++ version 0.1.0. This is the first ever release of Apache Iceberg for C++,
>> highlights include:
>> 
>> - Core Metadata: Implementation of the fundamental Iceberg data model, 
>> including
>> schemas, partition specs, and table metadata, with full JSON serialization
>> support.
>> - File I/O and Formats: A pluggable FileIO interface with initial support for
>> local filesystems, along with readers and writers for Avro and Parquet.
>> - Table API: A basic Table interface supporting metadata operations and scan
>> planning, accompanied by an in-memory catalog for development and testing.
>> 
>> This release marks a significant milestone, thanks everyone who has 
>> contributed
>> and community members who have helped along the way!
>> 
>> This release candidate is based on commit: 
>> b717675f6e82d5c87a5468093f1112d03cf677f8 [1].
>> 
>> The source release is hosted at [2].
>> 
>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
>> and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
>> 
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg C++ 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Iceberg C++ 0.1.0 because...
>> 
>> [1]: 
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/tree/b717675f6e82d5c87a5468093f1112d03cf677f8
>> [2]: 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-cpp-0.1.0-rc4
>> [3]: 
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>> 
>> Best,
>> Gang

Reply via email to