+1 (non binding) - verified signature and checksums - verified RAT license check - verified build/tests passing - ran some manual tests with GlueCatalog
- Drew On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 7:54 AM Jacky Lee <qcsd2...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Built and tested Spark 4.0.1 and Flink 2.0 on JDK17, including unit > tests, basic insert/read operations, and metadata validation. > > Thanks, > Jacky Lee > > Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> 于2025年9月8日周一 16:23写道： > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Ran following check and tests: > > 1. Verified checksum > > 2. Verified signature > > 3. Ran dev/check-license > > 4. Ran `gradlew build` > > > > All passed. > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 10:36 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Verified signature, checksum, license > >> > >> > >> Ran build successfully (except for a couple of Spark extension tests > due to my env) > >> > >> > >> Ran Spark 4.0 SQL with V3 format and Java 21 > >> > >> - Insert > >> - Update carries over row id and sets snapshot seq num correctly > >> - Select with _row_id and _last_updated_sequence_number > >> > >> > >> Run Flink 2.0 SQL testing with V2 format and Java 21 > >> - Insert > >> - Streaming read > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Steven > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 10:19 PM Yuya Ebihara < > yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Confirmed that Trino CI is green in Trino PR #25795. > >>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC > (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and > Snowflake. > >>> > >>> Yuya > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 1:38 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I have verified the signature and checksum, completed the build and > unit tests, and ran basic Spark table creation and queries. > >>>> > >>>> I also executed the tests against our Snowflake internal test suite. > One test failure was observed, related to snapshot expiry, caused by > Iceberg PR #13614 — “Fix incorrect selection of incremental cleanup in > expire snapshots.” I believe our test should be updated to reflect the > behavior introduced by this fix. > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 11:50 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache > Iceberg 1.10.0 release. > >>>>> > >>>>> The commit ID is 2114bf631e49af532d66e2ce148ee49dd1dd1f1f > >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5 > >>>>> * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5 > >>>>> * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/2114bf631e49af532d66e2ce148ee49dd1dd1f1f > >>>>> > >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > >>>>> * > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5 > >>>>> > >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: > >>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven > repository URL is: > >>>>> * > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1269/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Please download, verify, and test. > >>>>> > >>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: > >>>>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.0 > >>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > >>>>> > >>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are > encouraged to cast > >>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 > votes and more binding > >>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >
