+1 Kind regards, Fokko
Op do 4 dec 2025 om 08:25 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < [email protected]>: > Adding my own +1. > > @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to review. > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 (binding) >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1(binding) >> >>>> Yufei >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Best, >> >>>>> Prashant Singh >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording >> changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the java >> library (now). >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Cheers, >> >>>>>>> Dmitri. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and >> people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is essentially >> still alive. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best >> solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move >> forward when there has been a veto from the community. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to >> confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus >> we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale >> for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd >> have to dig up.) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Ryan >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any >> other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best >> solution available. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is >> providing a simple >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the >> namespace >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that >> are either >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or >> will >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for >> REST server >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for >> existing >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec >> in #10877 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> -- >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >> >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/ >> >
